@cagla40 wrote:
Why wasn’t +1 used in layer 3 (5-1) / 2? and why should 5 be 27 instead of 5 because it is 27.27.96 in a top layer? does this change the result?
Posts: 1
Participants: 1
@cagla40 wrote:
Why wasn’t +1 used in layer 3 (5-1) / 2? and why should 5 be 27 instead of 5 because it is 27.27.96 in a top layer? does this change the result?
Posts: 1
Participants: 1